We care about our visitors and respect personal information which you share with us. It is important to us that you are aware of data we are collecting about you and how we are doing it. Due to this we are updating our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. These updates will come into effect starting from May 25, 2018.
By using the site izispicy.com after May 25, 2018 you are acknowledging that you agree with the changes made in Privacy Policy, which you can read in detail here
All those videos with drunk/stoned guys "getting what they deserve" by injuring them are criminal. Hit them, drop them, ok. Don't hit a target who cannot defend himself like you're giving the killing blow to Satan. You're a criminal.
No, actually - he isn't - which is why he was never charged with a crime.
The actual video is much longer and makes it very clear the drunk moron had been antagonizing a man minding his own damn business. It wasn't until he called him an n-word to his face *and* kicked at his hand that the man finally snapped and hit him.
The law has LONG recognized that everyone has a breaking point. In this case, the courts refer to them as "fighting words" -- and by no less than the Supreme Court of the United States are words which "by their very utterance, inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace."
He literally asked for it ("Smack me!") and provoked it with the n-word and kick. The reaction was automatic and fully justified. No crime committed.
In India, that guy will be charged with attempt murder... such is the law.. so people can abuse anyone to any extent, without getting beaten.. even rapists/murderers can claim human rights..
> You're a criminal.
No, actually - he isn't - which is why he was never charged with a crime.
The actual video is much longer and makes it very clear the drunk moron had been antagonizing a man minding his own damn business. It wasn't until he called him an n-word to his face *and* kicked at his hand that the man finally snapped and hit him.
The law has LONG recognized that everyone has a breaking point. In this case, the courts refer to them as "fighting words" -- and by no less than the Supreme Court of the United States are words which "by their very utterance, inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace."
He literally asked for it ("Smack me!") and provoked it with the n-word and kick. The reaction was automatic and fully justified. No crime committed.
/gavel
can I see another 115 times ? ? ?